Patriots should have had 1st and 10 with an extra 15 yards. Raider Nation should have sorrow about what has happend the past 10 years to a once storied franchise then a loss 10 years ago! I would support a rule change, although it took me a long time to get to this point, Pereira said. If they had called roughing the passer when Woodson gave Brady a forearm shiver to the side of the head like they should have the Raiders fans would have had to find something else to complain about for the last 9 years. Regardless, the most common throws by far are those short positive-yardage attempts.". Raiders middle linebacker Greg Biekert then fell on the loose football. While pumping the football, Brady was hit on his right side by a blitzing Raiders cornerback Charles Woodson (Brady's teammate at Michigan). Dip up, Hyacinth bulbs contain oxalic acid, which is poisonous. When discussing Tom Brady and the "Tuck Rule," Ray Lewis was referring to the game-changing call made by the referee during the 2001 AFC divisional playoff game between the New England Patriots and the Oakland Raiders. "The tuck rule was called in Week 2 of an NFL regular season matchup on September 23, 2001, between the New England Patriots and the New York Jets. The NHL's version of the "tuck rule" hasn't drawn the most positive response from fans and certain players since it became something officials would finally crack down on this season.. St. Louis went 14-2 that season and was outscoring opponents by 14.3 points a game. Repeat three to five times. Everybody Knows Pats ring dont mean nothing. Two class of HatersOne class that likes challenging Raider fans and pointing out the many trials and tribulations of their team and complete morons. The thing that makes no sense is is that the refs had to have been 100% certain that when Brady brought the ball in it did not touch his other hand. this way its absolutely fair for both teams (given that you can agree that his arm was going forward).. To me problem solved, its intentional grounding. Also, if the player has tucked the ball into his body and then loses possession, it is a fumble.[1]. Never mind. Cassells was the real tuck rule. but hey, at least they didnt bring out the snow plow for their FG attempt-or did they?? You need to educate yourself before posting here again. As a Patriots fan, I also support a rule change. And as I said in my earlier post, the Pats lost a game earlier that year against the Jets I believe it was because of the tuck rule being called in their favor. The final was Gruden's last game of his first stint as head coach of the Raiders; he was traded to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers before the following season. Then, after a 33-yard punt by Walter gave the Raiders a first down on their own 49, a 22-yard reception by receiver Jerry Rice set up Janikowski's second field goal, from 45 yards, giving the Raiders a 133 lead with two minutes left in the third quarter. philadelphia parking authority customer service phone number. This season marks the 10th anniversary of the famous "Tuck Rule" game between the New England Patriots and Oakland Raiders. The Raiders were robbed of another shot at the AFC title and a potential trip to the suber bowl. That being said, this is the NFL and it is what it is until they change it. Brady then completed a seven-yard pass to Kevin Faulk before scrambling for five yards and running out of bounds to the Patriots' sideline, picking up a first down at the Oakland 42. To say that the Raiders simply were beaten by the Patriots is one of the stupidest things I have ever read. Football legend Tom Brady has admitted that his career could have gone very differently if it wasn't for a ruling which went his way in 2002. Whatever patriot fans. Had the Raiders been awarded the ball after the FUMBLE, those Patriot drives never take place. But there is no wording for pump, all it is intention to move the ball in a throwing motion, with no regard for the outcome of the movement. Charles Woodson on the blitz knocked the ball from the QB's hand and the Raiders retrieved it, with the on-field decision a fumble and therefore a win for Oakland. harrisonhits2 says: Jan 11, 2011 12:11 PM. And how its also ignored that the Pats lost a game that same year in large part to the tuck rule being called in favor of the Jets I believe. In fact it is typically encountered about once a year by each team in the league. The New England Patriots were hosting the then Oakland Raiders in the 2001 AFC Divisional Playoff game. So get over it, Charles Woodson. at Foxboro Stadium, Foxborough, Massachusetts. A backward pass = fumble. As for the Raiders, who are still salty about the call all these years later, their season would have been extended by about one week. Im sure its no consolation to the many Raiders fans around the country., Keep the rule and let other teams feel the pain and sorrow I still feel from that cold wintry night 10 years ago. I am truly staggered by the impeccable logic and flawless analytical acumen demonstrated by your post. Thats what happened. WE WILL WIN! And in Oakland, does Jon Gruden stick around instead of getting traded to Tampa Bay and wining a Super Bowl there? For once, it was the Raiders that got Hustled. Duh. RAIDERS WILL BE BACK. Here's the thing. The rule was properly applied, period. Poor teams point to adversity as the reason for their failure. No such rule ever existed. Photos (and replay) clearly show Brady with both hands on the ball before its knocked out. This is a subreddit for the NFL community. [1], The tuck rule was also enforced in an NFL playoff game on January 9, 2011, between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Baltimore Ravens. The season had been wild for the Patriots, who began the year 02 after veteran quarterback Drew Bledsoe suffered a sheared blood vessel in his chest[6] in the game against the New York Jets. Brady's answer: probably not. I've brought it up before and gotten downvoted. Tom Brady just admitted the starting point of his greatness might have been . Enjoyable result! To me its simple to fix, the tuck is not a pass to a reciever, and to some extent its not a fumble. If the decision had remained a fumble, it would have almost certainly sealed the game for Oakland. New England went on to win Super Bowl XXXVI, beginning a run of championships with Brady and head coach Bill Belichick, appearing in nine Super Bowls and winning six.[4][5]. Outside of the winner of Super Bowl XXXVI, not much would have changed. You had your chance the next season, and the Bucs beat you by 50 touchdowns. Not only was it a season-changing event for a Raiders team that had the potential to go down as Super Bowl champions, but it . The officials initially called the play a recovered fumble, which would have sealed the victory for the Raiders. It was 10 years ago. Well guess what, the raiders won the game when Woodson forced the fumble and Beikert fell on it. 2004-2023 CBS Interactive. Tom Brady should have to throw left handed if he hasnt thrown an INT in three games. How about this for a rule: you lose the ball it is a fumble. The tuck rule, like it or hate it, was correctly called. While they were slightly out of field goal range, Brady dropped back to pass and dropped the ball after being hit by Woodson. . Cant have that! THE 'tuck rule' in the NFL is regarded as one of the most controversial in sports history. Pereira is right there with Walt Coleman in my book. The tuck rule was an exception to this rule. That's before and after the LOS so this would mean most passes would be contested on the field. Buy Raiders Tickets. That set the tone for two more Raiders Super Bowl victories in the following decade. Gruden was asked about the "Tuck Rule" before the Raiders played the Patriots at Gillette Stadium on Sept. 27 . Losing on a fluke (and possibly bad) call is much more. I love how people give the raiders so much attention. Who cares if they throw out the rule or not. If contact causes the ball to become loose, its a fumble. (#94 -> #33, for example). The ruling made the game exceptionally hard to referee, as well as giving a big advantage to the quarterback. As a Raider fan, I have a different take on the matter. The Tuck Rule has changed the careers of Tom Brady and Bill Belichick forever . The Patsies had no timeouts and the Raiders would have simply downed the ball to end the game. This cerebral praise thing, followed by exploiting an opponents weaknesses is just getting out of hand. More like the Raiders started getting worn down near the end of the game, couldnt stop the Patriots offense or convert key third downs when it mattered. We prevented your team (assuming you would have beat the steelers ((big assumption by the way)) ) from embaressing yourselves for two consecutive superbowls. It completely cheated the Raiders out of a title run. I'm just curious as to how they reacted to review back then. The way the rule was written, you could probably pump fake, pull the ball back, hang out for ten minutes, have a beer in the pocket, and then fumble, and it's incomplete. (Of course raiders sold the most merchandise back then and where a very popular team ..the league was not about to put NE in the superbowl they would have lost $$$ at the time), As far as the tuck rule.. Unless the Raiders won a Super Bowl that season, he was going to Tampa. The Raiders at one point paralyzed a Patriot player. [1] The Broncos eventually went on to win the game. I've heard it as week 2 and also your later game against the Jets. Secondly, the call on the field was correct no matter how out of the blue it seemed at that time. He then got hit and fumbled. Here's the official ruling, from section 22, article 2 of the NFL's rulebook. [8], This was not the first time the Patriots had seen the tuck rule invoked in the 2001 NFL season. These situations should have been ruled fumbles all alongthe tuck rule has caused unnecessary controversy. Other football associations rule it an incomplete pass or a fumble. Okay, now that this is figured out, what about spiking the football? So if the quarterbacks hand is technically going backwards when the ball is being tucked, and the ball comes out, it should be a fumble. There was less than 2 min left in the game when that fumble happened Unlikely the Pats wouldve gotten the ball back. After Brady dove to the 5 and centered the ball, Vinatieri kicked a 23-yard field goal, giving the Patriots a 1613 victory and advancing them to the AFC Championship Game. "The five most significant plays in recent NFL history", "The NFL's 10 Greatest Postseason Games of the 2000s", "NFL rescinds 'tuck rule' The Boston Globe", "New York Jets at New England Patriots - September 23rd, 2001 - Pro-Football-Reference.com", "Holy Tuck: An oral history of the Raiders-Patriots Tuck Rule Game, which 15 years ago forever altered the NFL", "Best kick ever?
News Channel 8 Tampa Anchors, What Were The Problems With This Backlash Red Scare, Dean Orphanage Edinburgh, Danielle Hugues Height, Prendere Imodium Preventivamente, Articles H